🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “utter hypocrisy” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests proposals to prohibit tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing changes to a proposed legislation that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from tobacco-related illnesses, according to WHO calculations.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with public health regulations. In recent weeks, WHO officials raised concerns that the tobacco industry was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for various offences “varying from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia claims the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “specific rules can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the required influence for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

A BAT Zambia spokesperson commented: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which allow for stakeholder participation in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, adding that underage people should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to accomplish desired population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the representative explained, noting that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.